What comes next?

This is part of an ongoing essay that will try to find a way through our current political crisis to a peaceful resolution. I don’t offer final answers, just suggestions, so please feel free to comment.

Does democracy work? It’s a fair question, though rarely addressed. In America we take it as an article of faith more than anything, that democracy is the best form of government there is (“except for all the others,” perhaps, attributed to Winston Churchill). But really, does it work? Can deep moral problems be resolved by a majority vote? Can a democratic leader govern a divided population?

When I say divided here, I do not mean in the manner of a disagreement over policy, funding, or even administrative competence. I mean a deep division over purpose and mission.

Can we have a simultaneously secular and religious state?

The answer that seems right to me is: not within a single institution. It will be one or the other, and the dream that the religious and secular people will reconcile if only a majority has decided the matter, can never be realized. What this means is you cannot have a mutually satisfactory union with one another. There must be a separation: of church and state, yes, but also of church state and free government.

Until this is realized, however, there will be an internecine war between the two parties. Each will try to win a majority of the vote, but if that is not obtainable, to destroy the vote, because to lose is unacceptable for either side if they are going to be forced to finance the other’s establishment and so pay for their own perceived subjugation.

What has happened is the Republicans, representing the pharisee religious state, went to war first.

Knowing they cannot hold a majority to rule, they have wrecked the vote.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. documented the 2004 election disaster in the “swing” state of Ohio. Now he has looked ahead to what you can expect in 2006.

Please read Brad Friedman for more.

Related articles: How to hack an election, As church, so state, Was George Bush ever elected president?

2 Responses to “What comes next?”

  1. Schwartzenegger vetoes health care « cannablog Says:

    […] I’m serious about there being two completely diametric opposing conceptions of the purpose of government, and I really think there’s going to have to be a separation before there will be a resolution. Let people subscribe to the government they like, and if you don’t want to have anyone care about you when you’re sick or hungry, then choose the kind of government that will let you rot. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: